SPRINGFIELD – Members of a Senate committee in Illinois sat down with officials in Governor JB Pritzker’s administration on Friday in a hearing about tax changes the governor proposed to balance the state budget for fiscal 2022.
The Senate Revenue and Funds Committees held the joint hearing and interviewed the Directors of the Illinois Department of the Treasury and the Governor’s Bureau of Administration and Budget, among others.
In his budget proposal published in February, Pritzker outlined nine changes to corporate income tax law that would aim to generate $ 932 million in revenue for the state in order to maintain a balanced budget while keeping income taxes and government spending unchanged for Fiscal Year 22 beginning July 1 allow.
“The governor’s budget proposal is sensible and balanced,” David Harris, director of the Treasury, told lawmakers. “If passed as suggested by (Governor Pritzker), there would be an estimated $ 120 million surplus by the end of Fiscal Year 22.”
The biggest change in building income would be a cap on how much businesses can deduct from taxes due to their losses in any given year. Under current tax law, a company can take its net operating loss and reduce by that amount the amount of its income that will be taxable in future years.
Pritzker’s proposal would cap that deduction at $ 100,000 per year for the next three years, which the Treasury Department estimates would save the state $ 22,314 million in fiscal year.
Harris told lawmakers that the state’s 2,800 corporation taxpayers had deducted $ 6.4 billion in net operating losses from their taxes in 2018. Only 84 of those corporate taxpayers that year posted operating losses of $ 3.5 billion.
“My point is that the largest percentage (net operating losses) is borne by a very small number, and that means the vast majority of businesses will not be affected,” he said.
While the Pritzker administration has described the changes as “closing corporate tax loopholes,” three of the nine tax codes removed or changed under the proposed budget were introduced by Pritzker as part of budget negotiations with state Republicans in 2019.
The budget proposal put forward by Pritzker in 2019 was augmented with a gradual abolition of corporate income tax, an addition to real estate qualifying for the state machine and equipment tax exemption, and a tax deduction for creating new jobs in construction with secure Republican support.
All three provisions would be delayed or canceled in the governor’s plan to generate savings of approximately $ 102 million for fiscal year 22
This third provision, known as the Blue Collar Jobs Act, was due to go into effect in January. At the time of its passage, the bill was touted by both Pritzker and Republicans as a tax credit that would bring more jobs and businesses to Illinois.
However, implementation of the construction worker tax credit has been delayed by Pritzker, who cited losses in tax revenue due to the coronavirus pandemic.
Senator Chapin Rose, a Republican from Mahomet, asked Sturm, the governor’s budget director, why a bipartisan program should be cut if the state expects a surplus.
“Here we are at the end of COVID with Illinois being one of the top states in the country for unemployment, people in desperate need of work,” he said. “Why on earth did the government – did Governor Pritzker – decide that he was going to step down now, back from, back from, back, his word, his promise when he signed the Blue Collar Jobs Act?”
Aurora Democratic Senator Linda Holmes reiterated his concern.
“I hesitate a little, wondering if this is almost a poison pill when we talk about getting rid of some of the recent tax changes,” she said.
According to Sturm, the state’s short-term budget situation looked positive due to loans and an inflow of funds from the federal government as part of several coronavirus aid packages passed last year. However, difficult decisions regarding tax legislation had to be made for long-term stability.
“Illinois has struggled with a persistent budget deficit for the past few years, many years. These are more permanent changes that would attempt to address some of the underlying structural budgetary challenges,” Sturm said.
Other corporate tax changes that were of concern at the hearing include the reduction of a tax credit for individuals and businesses contributing to private school scholarships, a cap on the reimbursement retailers receive from collecting sales tax, and the expiry a sales tax exemption for biodiesel fuel.
Several business associations have submitted either oral or written statements against the proposals, including the Illinois Manufacturers’ Association, the Taxpayers Federation of Illinois, and the Illinois Retail Merchants Association.
Chicago Democratic Senator Elgie Sims, who chaired the hearing, said he had “heard a big discussion this morning as if this was a one-year fix,” and offered support for the budget’s long-term goal of solvency.
“If there are any other suggestions, we’re definitely looking forward to them, but these are the governor’s suggestions,” he said.
Greg Cox of the Illinois Soybean Growers Association said he appreciated the difficulty of Sturm’s position in that “it was tasked with building a budget with no general tax increases and with flat-rate spending,” but that there would be serious policy implications for the cut the exception for biodiesel fuel.
Those impacts are increased air pollution as more gasoline and less biodiesel are used in fuel blends, and the potential loss of 2,000 jobs is caused by the biodiesel fuel industry in Illinois, the largest soybean producer in the country.
He also presented Senate Draft 2394, submitted by the Growers Association through Essex Democratic Senator Patrick Joyce, as a compromise that would gradually eliminate the tax credit and save state money.