Governor indicators complete tax minimize law with controversial replace on psychological well being financing | information

(The Center Square) – The tax cut package signed by Governor Kim Reynolds and the realignment of mental health funding is described as a major achievement by Republican lawmakers of Iowa.

Senate Act 619 Adopted May in an extended term to specifically address tax issues and was signed by the governor on Wednesday.

“Today the Iowa Senate made Iowa more competitive,” Senate majority leader Jack Whitver, R-Ankeny, said last month. “Lowering the highest income tax rate to 6.5% means Iowa families will keep more of the money they make. Lower income tax rates make this state more attractive to small businesses and people looking for a new home, ”he said.

“The exit from inheritance tax ends the unjust practice of taxing the dead. The abolition of the mental health fee finally offers real wealth tax relief for Iower. Iowans has asked for tax breaks and the Iowa Senate has answered those calls, “added Whitver.

Senator Dan Dawson, R-Council Bluffs, chair of the Ways and Means Committee, agreed.

“Senate Republicans pledged bold tax reform when the January session started and this bill was tabled,” he said. Senate Act 619 is the tax bill Iowans deserve, and I am proud that the Iowa Senate passed it . “

However, Senate minority leader Zach Wahls, D-Coralville, saw this year as a failure in a statement at the end of the session.

“With our Build Back Better plan, the Iowa Democrats have tabled more than two dozen bills to help Iowans get back on their feet. Unfortunately, Governor Reynolds and the Republicans chose not to partner with us on these proposals. ”Wahls says their ideas have ensured long-term economic growth.

Democrats and Republicans largely agree on the pros and cons of the 2021 session; Likewise, the votes on the tax law closely followed the party lines. Senator Pam Jochum, D-Dubuque, backed most of the bill’s provisions, but transferring mental health funding to the state was a deal-breaker.

She believes the outcome will reduce funding for the 14 mental health regions. Mental health regulations will change regional property tax funding to nationwide support over the next two years. Jochum believes that a system that has existed for a long time doesn’t work well at the country level: “It’s better to give it to the people who are closest to the situation.”

Jochum says she takes psychiatric care very seriously and personally. Her mentally handicapped daughter Sarah died two years ago as a result of a fall over the stairs. Still, she believes the mental health dollars may not go down: “I really hope I’m wrong, but right now I think it won’t work out the way they suggested.”

Of course, the dollars saved are of great importance to everyone involved. It is estimated that the tax savings for individuals will be $ 1 billion over the next 10 years. That’s about $ 125 million a year. Annual savings per person are estimated at $ 40.

Of course, figuring out what will win a particular family or company is very different.

Dr. Ernie Goss is a regional economist who oversees the monthly report on business conditions for Central America.

Goss doesn’t downplay the total benefit of $ 1 billion over 10 years, even if $ 40 may sound like insignificant. And he complains that the law contains so many provisions that it does not give consumers a proper view of what they mean.

Jochum thinks the bill is simply too massive and should have been broken down into smaller pieces. She says she could have voted for many of these pieces.

Kristine Tidgren, director of the Center for Agricultural Law and Taxation for the state of Iowa, says the legislation has eight key provisions and 18 additional ones. In other words, Goss adds, the average person would need a tax advisor rather than an economist to fully explain the implications.

Still, Goss sees some of the provisions as positive for economic growth. It is helpful to move mental health costs from local property taxes to the national level. “Probably a good change and needs to be done. Property taxes can be very burdensome. I owned a house in Iowa. “

Goss also says that getting rid of federal taxes as a deduction from taxes in Iowa was a smart move. This earlier wording apparently left Iowa with a greater tax burden than other states that have already dumped that deduction. This makes the state less attractive for internal expansion and external investment. In particular, neighboring Missouri and South Dakota have lower tax rates than Iowa.

Hawkeye state joins three other states that have cut income tax rates since the pandemic began: Idaho, Oklahoma, and Montana. These data come from the tax foundation.

Compare that to New York, where the pandemic barely affected tax revenues. However, Albany recently increased tax rates for both individuals and businesses. Governor Reynolds says she will seek further tax cuts in the 2022 legislatures.