Indian government appealed against an international arbitration tribunal ruling that resulted in its claim ₹22,100 crore in back taxes from Vodafone Group Plc have been remitted to a senior court in Singapore and hearings are scheduled for September, sources said.
On September 25th last year, an international arbitration tribunal had the demand of the tax authorities ₹22,100 crore in back taxes and penalties related to the takeover of an Indian operator by the British telecommunications giant in 2007.
In December, the government moved in Singapore to set aside the arbitration award, mainly for judicial reasons. The case has been transferred to a higher court, with a hearing date for September, said two sources familiar with the matter.
The appeal was filed in the Singapore court as the Southeast Asian nation was the seat of the arbitration.
The government has similarly challenged the order of a three-person tribunal in the Hague Permanent Arbitration Court that asked India to return US $ 1.2 billion, plus interest and costs, to British oil and gas company Cairn Energy plc.
The government had used a 2012 law that gave tax authorities the power to reopen previous cases to collect taxes from Vodafone and Cairn on alleged capital gains made a few years ago.
Both Vodafone and Cairn had challenged the tax claims from bilateral investment protection agreements and initiated the arbitration proceedings. India lost both arbitrations.
Sources said the government believes that taxation is not covered by investment protection treaties with various countries and that tax law is a sovereign right in the country.
While the agreements are primarily aimed at protecting investments, the tax is levied on “income” generated by companies.
The 2012 Act, commonly referred to as the Retroactive Tax Act, was enacted after the Supreme Court in January of that year the tax authorities tried against Vodafone International Holdings BV for failing to withhold the withholding tax of $ 11.1 billion paid to Hutchison Telecommunications in 2007 , had declined to purchase a 67 percent stake in a wholly owned subsidiary on Cayman Island that indirectly holds shares in Vodafone India Ltd.
The Finance Act 2012, which retrospectively amended various provisions of the Income Tax Act 1961, included provisions regarding the taxation of gains on the transfer of interests in a non-Indian company that derived significant value from underlying Indian assets such as the Vodaone transaction derives with Hutchison in 2007. She wanted a buyer like Vodafone to be subject to retroactive withholding tax.
Applying this law, the tax authorities beat Vodafone in January 2013 with a tax claim of ₹14,200 crore, including main tax of ₹7,990 crore and interest, but no penalties. In February 2016, she updated the tax claim ₹22,100 crore plus interest.
Vodafone has challenged this tax claim by initiating arbitration under the Dutch-Indian bilateral investment treaty. The arbitral tribunal decided unanimously in favor of Vodafone.
According to the award, the state must reimburse Vodafone 60 percent of the legal costs and half of the 6,000 euros that Vodafone pays for the appointment of an arbitrator to the panel.
Sources said the Indian government’s liability amounts to ₹85 crore in legal fees.
In the separate Cairn case, India was asked to pay the value of the shares sold, the confiscated dividend and the withheld tax refunds to collect a portion of the tax claim from the UK firm, plus interest.
Cairn Energy, which made the country’s largest oil discovery, was in demand in March 2015 for ₹10,247 crore in taxes on alleged capital gains made in reorganizing its India business in 2006 prior to listing the local entity.
In February 2007, Vodafone International Holding (a Dutch company) bought 100 percent of the shares in the Cayman Islands-based company CGP Investments for US $ 11.1 billion to indirectly gain 67 percent control of the Indian company Hutchison Essar Ltd.
The Tax Department believed the deal was aimed at avoiding capital gains tax in India and made a tax claim that was rejected by the Supreme Court in 2012.
In order to stop abuse and close the loophole of such indirect transfers of Indian assets, the government changed the law in 2012 to make such transfers taxable in India.
Subscribe to something Mint newsletter
* Please enter a valid email
* Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.
Never miss a story again! Stay connected and informed with Mint. Download our app now !!