Rental property house owners obtain belated end-of-year assist below the Nationwide Expenditures Act

Stephen Ashley isn’t sure how much his company will benefit from a 116-word tax break for residential property owners added to the bus and coronavirus aid package late last month.

However, the Rochester, NY apartment developer believes it will be worth more than the $ 540,000 its company spent lobbying on what it calls the tech solution to the 2017 tax law revision.

Ashley, whose company owns approximately 3,000 residential units in New York State, and other real estate developers will benefit from a 2017 tax law change that resulted in higher taxes for the more heavily indebted residential owners.

The correction in last month’s spending package allows certain owners of apartments built or purchased before January 1, 2018 to write off their investments over 30 years instead of 40 years. The Joint Tax Committee estimates the provision buried on page 2,452 of the massive omnibus package will cost $ 3.3 billion over 10 years.

Ashley and others familiar with drafting the 2017 bill said it was not the legislature’s intention to expose residential property owners to the longer depreciation period. But the law text was clear enough that the finance department couldn’t regulate property owners out of sight without new laws, Ashley said in an interview.

“If you sit down and explain the facts to lawmakers, they say, ‘It doesn’t make any sense. That wasn’t right, ”said Ashley, a former Fannie Mae chairwoman who knows the Capitol. He said he personally promoted lawmakers for the solution, and Senate records show that he also used lobbyists from DLA Piper LLP’s Washington office to help resolve the issue.

Ashley’s hometown Congressman Rep. Joseph D. Morelle, DN.Y., a member of the powerful rules committee elected in 2018 after serving Rochester in the State Assembly for 27 years, was the main sponsor of the stand-alone legislation to create the Law to be enacted Fix.

Ashley, who describes Morelle as a “longtime friend,” was one of the main legislators responsible for his first run of Congress, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

The industry also received great support from Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the No. 2 Republican in his chamber and a member of the Finance Committee on Tax Letters, who instituted the Senate version.

“It’s a sheer benefit to people already in this situation,” said Michael Wiener, a Los Angeles attorney who advises clients on complex real estate transactions.

Wiener said the hope is that the finance department can quickly issue guidelines on how home rental companies can apply for refunds by amending their tax returns for 2018 and 2019.

Based on the JCT valuation of the bulk bill, real estate owners and developers could benefit from the Treasury equivalent to approximately $ 1.2 billion in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021 alone, including refunds.

Prior to the 2017 tax overhaul, residential property owners were generally able to deduct all of their business interest expenses from their taxes, even if they were so heavily indebted that interest costs outweighed income.

In the meantime, they used the so-called general depreciation system, which allowed the cost of a residential property to be written off over 27.5 years. In addition to interest expenses, owners could also deduct 3.6 percent of the value of a property from their taxes every year.

The tax overhaul changed these two deductions for landlords.

To compensate for a sharp drop in the corporate tax rate, the law limited the amortization of interest expenses to 30 percent of taxable income.

“Congress said” you have to pay the whistler “when you are a debt-ridden company, said Jason D. Dexter, executive director of the Washington National Tax Practice of accountants KPMG.

That would have been a severe blow to smaller home owners like maisonettes and four-unit buildings who are constantly borrowing money to fix roofs, replace windows, and the like, Ashley said.

The law also gave companies a way to bypass the interest deduction limits if they were willing to operate on what is known as the alternative system of depreciation – which is typically a 40 year depreciation schedule for commercial and residential property owners. This corresponds to a lower annual deduction of 2.5 percent than under applicable law.

However, the drafters of the 2017 law decided that residential property owners should be less affected than commercial real estate companies, so they wrote a more generous 30-year residential property depreciation plan into the legislation.

However, the legislature has not stipulated that the 30-year schedule should apply to all residential properties. Instead, older apartment complexes have been made subject to the general effective date of the depreciation provision on January 1, 2018. For developers whose properties were “put into operation” before that date, the change meant a significant tax increase.

Real estate groups called the harsher treatment of rental properties prior to 2018 “draft oversight” as Congress did not intend to establish a depreciation rule for older and new properties.

“There are few political arguments for requiring real estate companies to write down older properties over time,” wrote several industry associations in a letter they co-sponsored with Thune, Morelle and Rep. Brad Wenstrup, R-Ohio, a co-sponsor , for introducing the fix. “It is unlikely that Congress intended such a drastic change.”

The letter, dated December 6, 2019, one day after the bill was passed, was led by the National Multifamily Housing Council and signed by industrial companies such as the National Association of Home Builders, the National Association of Realtors and the Real Estate Roundtable.

The injection of cash into a particularly difficult sector could be timely. According to lawmakers and experts, the scarce supply of rental apartments, especially for tenants with lower incomes, reached a crisis level before the pandemic.

According to data from the 2019 census, nearly 40 percent of tenants spend 35 percent or more of their income on housing, a key measure of invalidity. Unemployment rates have nearly doubled since then, leaving millions of eviction tenants and landlords in dire financial straits.

Morelle said in a statement that the 2017 law “jeopardized the already critically low supply of affordable housing in our country” and the 30-year depreciation period will “ease financial pressure on tenants and apartment building owners, who are now even more burdened because of the COVID-19 crisis. “

Matthew Berger, who administers tax policy for the National Multifamily Housing Council, said the collective provision corrects a mistake in tax legislation that “unnecessarily disrupted cash flow and increased property developers’ tax liability.” The result was less money to either invest in older assets or develop new real estate, Berger said.

It’s not entirely clear why the older residential correction wasn’t included in the original 2017 tax law.

It is possible that it was just an “editorial mistake,” as Berger put it, compounded by the rapid pace at which Republicans wrote and passed the complex tax overhaul.

It is also possible that, given their budget reconciliation instructions, the drafters had cost in mind in order to limit the impact of the deficit to no more than $ 1.5 trillion over a decade. And it is possible that some wanted to make sure that the benefits were an incentive to build and invest.

Not only was the update “technical” enough that the JCT couldn’t charge it, as the Revenue Scorekeepers did with a retail and restaurant depreciation fix, which they said they read the law simply based on their own understanding of lawmakers would align. Intention.

In any case, Ashley believes industry lobbyists simply dropped the ball in the 2017 negotiations. “Their focus was solely on maintaining the transferred interest,” he said.

This is an indication of the more generous tax treatment of capital gains that real estate and other investment partnerships may have on their share of a Fund’s profits from the sale of assets. The final law of 2017 extended the asset holding period required to qualify for lower capital recovery rates from one to three years and cost investment partnerships an estimated $ 1.1 billion over a decade – far less than critics of the treatment wanted from interest income.

Post rental property owners are getting belated assistance with the year-end law, which first appeared on roll call.


(c) 2021 CQ appeal

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC